Program exception - array bounds exceeded

Hello SWMM users:
I have my SWMM models working now but I get the messsage in reference
when I run it for my Watershed. I have eliminated Land Use and nutrient
simulation but still have the same error.
Does anyone of you know what it means?
This is a copy of my input file:
SW 1 0 9
MM 8 1 2 3 10 11 12 13 14
@ 1 'c:
ain d3240180700
ndc0700.dnt'
@ 9 'c:hawlings
unoff estannual.dnt'
$RUNOFF
A1 'Run of Runoff block'
A1 'Hawlings watershed'
B1 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 1 1 1 70
B2 0 0 1 0
B3 3600 7200 86400 4 991231
D1 1
F1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
H1 1 1 2100 9758 1644.8 2 0.01727 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28828 0.00017
H1 1 2 2102 2043 1350.4 4 0.02076 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.16 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 3 2103 2769 3296 0 0.0155 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 4 2106 3929 819.2 3 0.021 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 5 2107 1417 4160 0 0.01476 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.19 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 6 2108 22409 7232 3 0.01048 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.19 0.28588 0.00021
H1 1 7 2109 30554 2060.8 5 0.01217 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28811
0.00017
H1 1 8 21010 12213 10579.2 4 0.00907 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28653
0.00017
H1 1 9 21011 10915 2803.2 4 0.01536 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.22 0.2887
0.00018
H1 1 10 21012 3209 13600 17 0.00877 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.17 0.23848
0.00014
H1 1 14 21 18620 934.4 1 0.02466 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.22 0.28906 0.00017
H1 1 15 2101 12575 691.2 8 0.02628 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28925
0.00017
H1 1 16 24 18950 652.8 12 0.02391 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.27467 0.00016
H1 1 17 27 19674 659.2 20 0.01799 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.22695 0.00013
H1 1 18 21013 17015 665.6 2 0.02677 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.28396
0.00018
H1 1 19 21014 18080 659.2 29 0.01627 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.23 0.04 2e-005
H1 1 100 23 3583 1868.8 11 0.01662 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28925
0.00017
H1 1 101 22 1879 710.4 10 0.02334 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28557 0.00023
H1 1 102 23 1313 1363.2 0 0.02213 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.18 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 103 25 1023 3302.4 0 0.01503 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.14 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 104 22 17734 620.8 5 0.02245 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.22 0.28799 0.00019
H1 1 105 26 18821 563.2 2 0.026 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28096 0.00017
H1 1 106 25 1837 851.2 0 0.01908 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 107 26 8462 5209.6 5 0.01277 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.19 0.27917 0.00016
H1 1 108 28 1500 7526.4 10 0.01021 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.28098 0.00024
H1 1 109 28 999 2073.6 0 0.0123 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.28925 0.00017
H1 1 1010 210 2354 10636.8 11 0.00901 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.22 0.28925
0.00017
H1 1 1011 210 1405 2880 5 0.01508 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28493 0.00017
H1 1 1012 21016 7563 14227.2 7 0.00818 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.19 0.28564
0.00017
H1 1 1013 29 8248 1433.6 5 0.01863 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.24087
0.00014
H1 1 1014 29 3922 819.2 23 0.01456 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.22 0.13268 8e-005
H1 1 1015 20 7770 18048 5 0.00745 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.17 0.28812 0.00017
H1 1 1016 21015 2980 16748.8 4 0.00792 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.28925
0.00017
H1 1 1017 21015 18817 761.6 5 0.02659 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.21 0.28873
0.00017
H1 1 1018 21016 9992 2380.8 6 0.01694 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.18 0.28925
0.00017
H1 1 1019 21018 15248 716.8 22 0.02683 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.22 0.26538
0.00016
H1 1 1020 21018 26512 1222.4 19 0.01987 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.23293
0.00014
M1 0 0
$ENDPROGRAM

Bill -

Your file runs okay for me (I substituted my own rainfall file; you should check yours is okay using COMBINE).

Suggestions -
1) change your B2 line to 1 1 0. That will reduce the number of printouts in the output file, one of which may be the problem in your SWMM version
2) download the latest SWMM.EXE from www.ccee.orst.edu/swmm
3) you have F0<Fc for your soils parameters. This could blow up some versions of Runoff, as it doesn't make a lot of sense. F0 is typically a few inches per hour.

Regards,
Mitch Heineman, P.E.
CDM

Thanks for your prompt answer. It looks that windows-xp is making crazy things on my PC along with DOS programs, I will go back to a good version of windows like 98 which I have been recommended to be the best one.

Thanks a lot again for your help, I am back to the track.
Best regards,
William Medina
GRA - UMCP