Share/Save/Bookmark
Subscribe
 

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2008, 02:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 55
XS should be straight, shouldn't it?

Hi to all,

I have question related to delineate the cross-section in HEC-GeoRAS.

In theory, the XS should be straight. However, in some applications, the XS line can be curve as well (like the poster from RiverCAD).

Can anyone explain me where (both along the channel and along a XS) the XS should be straight and where it can be curve?

Best regards,

Tri Van
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2008, 07:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 221
"In theory, the XS should be straight"

No, I would say in theory the XS should be perpendicular to the direction of the flow. Flow perpendicular to the cross section is the assumption of one-dimensional programs like RAS.

For an "S" shaped river, sometimes you have to make an arbritrary XS shape just to keep the XSs from crossing each other.

I usually draw the channel part of the XS as a straight line. I adjust the shape of the XS in the overbank to try and keep the flow perpendicular to the XS section line. Ideally, the XS should be whatever shape is required to keep all the flow lines perpendicular, but it depends on how much time I want to spend messing around with the XS and whether it seems hydraulically relevant for the given data set.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2008, 02:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 55
XS - U relationship

Hi,

Thank you very much for your reply.

I have tried a curved cross section which make the length of that cross section is longer than others. Therefore, the calculated U at the cross section is much smaller than at the others as well.

What do you think about this?

Besr regards,

Tri Van
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2008, 01:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 221
I'm not totally sure what you are asking. Is the question: "if the cross section is really curved, the cross section would be longer than a straight cross section, and because the cross section is longer the cross section area would also be larger and this could effect the hydraulics?" Yes, I would agree that is correct. If the length in the overbank is much bigger (because of the length added by the curve) the area will be bigger and the velocity will be lower. Depending on the data set, this might be something to worry about.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2008, 01:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 55
Thank you

Yes, it is the issue I worry about.

Thank you for sharing idea with me.

Best regards,

Tri Van
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 AM.